Editorial Standards
Our commitment to accuracy, transparency, and integrity in every article we publish. Learn how we research, verify, and maintain the highest standards of health information journalism.
The information on this site is for educational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making health decisions.
Our Five Core Principles
These pillars guide every editorial decision and publication we make.
Accuracy First
Every claim is fact-checked against peer-reviewed studies, medical databases, and expert sources. We verify data before publication and update articles when new evidence emerges.
Full Transparency
We disclose our sources, editorial process, and any potential conflicts of interest. Our readers deserve to know exactly where information comes from and how we evaluated it.
Expert Input
Articles involving health topics are reviewed by qualified medical professionals. We believe diverse expert perspectives strengthen our content and serve readers better.
Balanced Perspective
We present multiple viewpoints on complex topics. When scientific debate exists, we explain the different positions fairly and help readers understand the evidence.
Continuous Improvement
We welcome feedback and corrections. Science evolves, and so does our content. We actively monitor reader input and update articles to reflect current best practices.
Our Fact-Checking Process
A rigorous four-step approach ensures accuracy at every stage.
Research & Source Identification
Our writers consult peer-reviewed journals (PubMed, Google Scholar), clinical guidelines from recognized health organizations, and interviews with qualified medical professionals. We prioritize recent, high-quality research over outdated or promotional sources.
Content Review by Experts
Before publication, every article about health topics is reviewed by a qualified medical advisor or subject matter expert. They check for scientific accuracy, appropriate context, and balanced representation of evidence.
Editorial Quality Assurance
Our editorial team conducts a final review focused on clarity, citation accuracy, and compliance with our standards. We verify all links, study references, and expert credentials are correct and current.
Post-Publication Monitoring
After launch, we track reader feedback and monitor for emerging research that might affect accuracy. Articles are regularly reviewed and updated to maintain currency. Any significant corrections are noted clearly with dates.
Editorial Team
Our diverse team of health writers, editors, and medical advisors work collaboratively to deliver trustworthy information.
Magdalena Kowalski
Editor-in-Chief & Medical Advisor
MD in Internal Medicine with 12 years of clinical experience. Specializes in preventive health and nutrition science. Oversees all health-related content and ensures medical accuracy across our platform.
Piotr Nowak
Senior Health Writer
Science journalist with 8 years reporting on health topics. Focuses on translating complex research into accessible, evidence-based articles. Expert in vitamin science and cardiovascular health.
Natalia Szymańska
Fact-Checker & Researcher
Holds a degree in Biology with specialty in research methodology. Conducts primary source verification and maintains our fact-checking database. Ensures every claim is traceable and defensible.
Prof. Andrzej Lewandowski
Advisory Board — Cardiology
Professor of Cardiology at Warsaw Medical University. Reviews articles on heart health and cardiovascular vitamins. Brings academic rigor and latest clinical insights to our content.
Corrections & Updates Policy
How to Report an Error
If you believe you've found an inaccuracy in one of our articles, we welcome your feedback. Please contact our editorial team with the following information:
- The specific article title and publication date
- The exact claim or statistic you believe is incorrect
- Your evidence or source material (links to studies, expert credentials, etc.)
- Your contact information so we can follow up with you
Send corrections to: [email protected]
Our Review Process
When we receive a correction report, our team follows this process:
- Acknowledgment: We respond within 2 business days to confirm receipt of your report.
- Investigation: Our fact-checkers verify the claim against current sources and expert guidance.
- Decision: We determine whether the correction is warranted and what action to take.
- Implementation: If the report is valid, we update the article and add a correction notice.
- Notification: We inform you of our decision and any changes made.
How We Mark Corrections
When we identify and correct an error, we make it transparent to readers:
Correction notice example:
Updated [Date]: This article has been revised to clarify [specific change]. The original version stated [original text]. We thank [Reader Name] for bringing this to our attention.
All corrections are timestamped and logged. We do not silently edit articles without noting the change. Readers always know what was updated and when.
Regular Content Updates
Beyond corrections, we actively refresh articles to reflect emerging research and evolving best practices:
Scientific Developments
We monitor new peer-reviewed studies and update articles when significant findings emerge.
Guideline Changes
When major health organizations revise their recommendations, we update our articles accordingly.
Expert Review
Articles on health topics are periodically reviewed by our medical advisors to ensure continued accuracy.
Link Maintenance
We verify that all source links remain active and redirect to current versions if URLs change.
Our Transparency Commitment
We believe our readers deserve to know:
- Where information comes from — Every significant claim includes citations or expert attribution.
- What we changed — Corrections and updates are clearly marked with dates and explanations.
- Who wrote it — Articles include author credentials and medical review information when relevant.
- What we don't know — We clearly distinguish between established science and emerging research.
Conflicts of Interest Policy
At Stronger Men Herbs, we maintain strict policies to prevent conflicts of interest from influencing our editorial content:
Financial Independence
Our editorial decisions are made independently of commercial interests. While our organization operates a product line, our editorial team operates with complete independence from marketing and sales departments. Articles are not created to promote products.
Source Disclosures
When we cite research or interview experts, we disclose any financial relationships those sources have with relevant companies or industries. We favor peer-reviewed studies over promotional materials.
Expert Independence
Our medical advisors review content for accuracy, not approval. They operate independently and are expected to flag any biases they observe. We do not accept advertising or sponsorships that could compromise editorial judgment.
Transparency Notices
When articles mention products or companies with which we have relationships, we include clear disclosure statements. Readers always know when content involves organizational affiliates.
Questions About Our Standards?
We welcome questions about our editorial process, methodologies, or specific articles. Our team is committed to transparency and open dialogue with our readers.
For editorial inquiries, fact-checking questions, or to report corrections:
You can also reach us at our main office:
ul. Słoneczna 159, Katowice, Poland